---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---



---

In the two-way trading landscape of foreign exchange investment, the battle between technical and fundamental analysts seems to never cease. However, a noteworthy phenomenon is that in two-way trading, traders who actively participate in this factional struggle are often the ones who suffer losses.

---

The reason these traders are so keen on debating whether "technical analysis is more effective" or "fundamental analysis is more reliable" is essentially because they haven't yet found a path to stable profits and their understanding of market principles remains fuzzy. They attempt to validate their own analytical methods by engaging in factional debates, or to find the so-called "optimal solution" within them, alleviating the anxiety of losses. However, they overlook the fact that debate itself doesn't provide substantial support for improving trading skills or achieving profitability. Instead, excessive focus on factional differences can distract from honing core trading logic and summarizing market practices, further trapping them in a cycle of losses.
In stark contrast, in forex trading, those who truly rely on their own strength to achieve stable profits rarely actively engage in disputes between technical and fundamental analysts. For them, the core goal of trading is to achieve consistent profits, not to theoretically prove the superiority of one particular method. Most traders in this category embrace a "quietly making a fortune" mentality, preferring to invest their time and energy in tracking market trends, optimizing their trading strategies, refining their risk control systems, and honing their trading mindset. Through solid practice, they continuously strengthen and enhance their profitability. After all, when traders can consistently profit in the forex market through their own strength, the debate over whether technical analysis or fundamental analysis is superior becomes meaningless. They understand that both technical and fundamental analysis are merely tools to aid trading decisions, not the key to profitability. Therefore, they don't need to engage in debate to demonstrate the value of their methods, but instead focus on achieving consistent returns through practical application.
Further observation reveals that in forex trading, the debate over whether technical analysis or fundamental analysis is superior primarily falls into two categories: those already experiencing losses, and those currently experiencing losses but still struggling to find a profitable path. For these traders, lacking a mature trading system and a stable profit model, their understanding of the market tends to remain at an "either-or" level, believing that only by finding the "best" method or approach can they escape losses. They eagerly seek to pinpoint the superiority of a particular approach to clarify their learning and practice, reducing uncertainty in their exploration process. However, they fail to recognize that the complexity of the forex market means there's no single "optimal approach" that works for everyone. Different analytical methods may have different effects in different market environments and trading scenarios. Excessive focus on comparing approaches can lead to neglecting to consider their own trading needs and market compatibility.
In fact, in two-way forex trading, whether a trader initially leans towards technical or fundamental analysis, the key isn't choosing the right approach, but whether, through continuous learning and practice, they can overcome losses and build a complete and effective trading system of their own. When traders can rely on this system to consistently profit in forex trading using methods that align with their own understanding and operating habits, they will gradually shed their obsession with the pros and cons of different schools of thought. They will then clearly understand that the core criterion for judging the value of an analytical method or trading approach is not its affiliation with a particular school of thought, but rather its ability to help them achieve profitability and obtain tangible results. In other words, when it comes to profitability, labels like "technical," "fundamental," or "a combination of both" no longer matter. The method that adapts to their trading logic, aligns with actual market trends, and ultimately delivers stable returns is the truly "powerful" choice. This shift in perspective is both a crucial sign that a trader is transitioning from losses to profits and a key indicator of their maturing trading skills.

In the two-way trading of forex investment, traders' attitudes toward making big money differ significantly between the real world and the virtual world of the internet.

---

In real life, traders tend to be candid when communicating with those they know well. However, exaggerating and claiming that making money is easy can easily lead to ridicule. Therefore, traders tend to express their opinions realistically in the real world, especially when speaking to those who understand their true circumstances.
However, in the virtual world of the internet, the situation is quite different. Due to the anonymity of the internet, traders' expressions are often influenced by external factors. When traders claim that making money is easy, they may attract attention and admiration, while if they honestly express the difficulties of making money, they may be looked down upon or even despised. This phenomenon, to a certain extent, reflects the impulsive and utilitarian mentality of the internet, where people are more inclined to believe claims that success appears easy.
On the internet, many so-called "forex traders" are not actually traders, but rather sales representatives of forex brokerage platforms, sales staff of fund management teams, or marketers of training teams. They disguise themselves as traders, exploiting the anonymity of the internet to exaggerate forex investment returns in order to attract potential clients. Their goal may be to sell courses or teaching materials, or to recruit participants for training sessions in exchange for commissions. This behavior not only misleads investors but also exacerbates the gap between the virtual and real worlds of the internet.

In the two-way trading world of forex investment, there's a seemingly counterintuitive phenomenon: many forex traders, after devoting significant time to reading trading books and accumulating extensive theoretical knowledge, actually experience increasing losses in actual trading.

---

This discrepancy between "knowledge accumulation" and "trading results" isn't due to a poor learning attitude on the part of traders, but rather stems from the limitations of forex trading books themselves, the disconnect between theory and practice, and the complex dynamics of the market. It profoundly reflects the fundamental difference between "theoretical" and "real-world" forex trading learning.
To delve deeper into the root causes of this phenomenon, we must first confront the prevailing situation among authors of forex trading books. Approximately 99 percent of authors of books on two-way forex trading may not possess the skills to consistently generate profits themselves, and many have even experienced chronic losses themselves. When traders hope to learn profitable strategies from these authors, they are essentially accepting the experience of those who have lost money. Even if the books appear to contain various trading theories and strategies, they offer little practical guidance for achieving profitability. After all, if the authors themselves can't overcome losses, how can their content truly help readers achieve profits? Even more regrettable, many traders have already spent years poring over these books before realizing this problem. Not only do they fail to improve their trading skills, but they may also develop entrenched trading habits due to misguided theories, laying hidden dangers for their future trading careers.
Even putting aside the author's ability, contemporary forex trading books themselves have insurmountable limitations. Even if traders memorize their content by heart, they still can't truly learn practical trading. The core problem lies in the fact that "the key information that truly guides practical trading" is not included in the books. The vast majority of trading books on the market tend to only convey concepts, lacking concrete, practical details. This emphasis on concepts over details directly leads to a huge gap between theory and practice. Many traders, when they first start trading, gather every trading book they can find and read it thoroughly, driven by curiosity about the market and a desire for profit. However, as their learning progresses, they gradually encounter various contradictions and confusions: the theories expounded in the books simply don't correspond to market realities. Many contents seem "easy to understand" at first glance, but once they enter the actual operation, they immediately become at a loss.
This disconnect between theory and practice is particularly evident in the books' vague descriptions of key trading rules. For example, almost all trading books mention the core principle of "cut losses and let profits run", but for key details that directly affect the results of operations, such as "how to cut losses", "at what time point to cut losses", and "how much the amplitude of each cut should be set", the books often avoid discussing them, leaving only abstract concepts for traders to figure out on their own; for another example, books often emphasize "don't trade frequently", but the specific definition of "frequent trading" is always vague - some people engage in intraday short-term trading and can still make profits by operating several orders a day, while others choose long-term trading and can still make profits by opening a position once a month or even longer. This difference in reality is in sharp contrast to the general description in the books, making it impossible for traders to judge where the boundary of "frequent" is; in addition, most books will advise traders to build "their own trading system", but faced with a variety of system models on the market, the books neither explain "which type of system should be selected to suit their own trading style" nor clarify "how to accurately judge the system's entry signals and exit points". Furthermore, books often contain numerous contradictory concepts regarding topics like "mindset management" and "controlling human nature," failing to provide a unified standard for understanding and lacking actionable adjustment methods, further exacerbating traders' confusion.
These persistent contradictions and confusions have led many traders to question the professionalism of the authors of trading books, and even to question their deceptive nature. For a period of time, traders often find themselves in a cycle of "belief and skepticism": they choose to believe because, looking back on their own trading experiences, they vaguely perceive that certain concepts in the book have a hidden connection to market dynamics, and some of the content seems to provide some guidance for trading decisions; they then choose to doubt because, even after reading every trading book they can find, they still haven't found a single, directly implementable, profitable method. This wavering state can persist for a considerable period of time, until traders find a teacher with extensive practical experience and systematically study with him/her. Only then can these long-standing concerns be truly resolved.
Reflecting on this learning journey, we'll discover two main reasons why traders can't learn trading from books. First, whether it's modern trading books or classic works from the past, the vast majority of authors lack the ability to teach others to achieve consistent trading profits. If the authors themselves don't thoroughly understand the core logic and practical details of profitable trading, how can they convey effective methods to their readers? Secondly, there are indeed a few truly proficient traders in the market, and they have written books on the subject. However, due to various complex factors (perhaps due to a desire to protect core technology or a belief that details are difficult to fully convey through text), their books often only retain trading concepts while omitting the most crucial practical details. Anyone who truly engages in actual trading knows that in the forex market, it's often these omitted details that determine success or failure. Unfortunately, true trading experts rarely include these crucial details in their books.
This is the fundamental reason why many traders, despite reading numerous trading books, still fail to achieve profitability in forex trading. If you want to truly master forex trading, the most effective path isn't to rely solely on self-study through books. Instead, seek out a teacher with proven profitability and extensive practical experience to learn directly. This is the fastest way to shorten the learning cycle and avoid cognitive misconceptions. In contrast, relying solely on individual exploration and research not only consumes a significant amount of time but is also prone to repeated trial and error in the market, often due to misguided theories or cognitive biases, leading to unnecessary losses. This difficulty is far greater than most traders anticipate.

In the two-way trading world of forex investment, an objective fact must be recognized: no forex trader has a 100% win rate, either in theory or practice.

---

The only special situation in which a trader can maintain a "100% win rate record" is if they permanently exit the forex market after generating a profit. In this scenario, the trader's trading record remains at the point of their last profitable trade, and no new trading data is generated thereafter. Naturally, there will be no losing trades, thus maintaining the appearance of a "100% win rate." However, this "win rate" does not stem from the trader's consistent and stable trading ability, but rather from an artificially fixed result achieved through "terminating trades." This is essentially a one-sided interpretation of the concept of "win rate," lacking any practical reference value and certainly not proof of a trader's ability to consistently generate profits.
This fact is fully confirmed by the practice of professional traders worldwide. In the two-way forex trading, even world-renowned forex investment fund managers, with their deep professional backgrounds, extensive research teams, and sophisticated trading systems, cannot achieve a 100% win rate. Regardless of the trading strategy these professionals employ—whether it's long-term strategies based on macroeconomic fundamentals, swing trading relying on technical analysis, or high-frequency trading focused on short-term fluctuations—they can't completely avoid the possibility of losses in the complex and volatile foreign exchange market. The foreign exchange market is influenced by multiple unpredictable factors, including global economic data, geopolitical events, and central bank monetary policy adjustments. Any trading strategy has limitations, and even if a high probability of success is achieved, it's difficult to achieve 100% absolute perfection.
Furthermore, expanding our perspective to the entire derivatives trading landscape, in the futures market, even looking back at the various "trading masters" who have achieved short-term success through precise judgment and exceptional execution, none have ever achieved a 100% win rate. Similar to the foreign exchange market, the futures market is characterized by high volatility and uncertainty. Price movements are influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including supply and demand, policy adjustments, and market sentiment. Even the most skilled traders can face losses due to sudden market fluctuations or inadequate strategy adaptability. This further demonstrates that a 100% win rate is an unrealistic fantasy in mature trading markets.
Under these market dynamics, those who claim a 100% win rate to traders are often not truly sharing their superior trading experience, but rather using their "high win rate" as a gimmick to attract attention and ultimately collect tuition fees. These individuals often exploit ordinary traders' desire for "stable profits" by exaggerating their trading abilities and fabricating flawless trading records, enticing them into participating in paid training, purchasing trading courses, or joining so-called "elite trading communities." In reality, their claims of a "100% win rate" defy market principles and often conceal a deceptive advertising trap. Traders who fall for these claims will not only struggle to learn effective trading methods, but may also face the risk of financial loss.
Besides the false claims of a "100% win rate," another red flag to be wary of in forex trading is a "steep equity curve." This so-called "steep equity curve" refers to a rapid, near-vertical upward trend in the profit curve of a capital account over a short period of time. Professional traders consider this type of curve to be essentially a "scam," and this assessment is undoubtedly justified. From a normal trading perspective, even if a trader possesses exceptional trading skills, the growth of their account's profits will inevitably follow a gradual path, constrained by factors such as market volatility, capital size, and risk management. It's difficult to achieve steep, non-volatile growth in the short term. A steep capital curve is either the result of fabricated performance through fabricated trading data and tampering with account records, or the result of short-term, exorbitant profits achieved through high-risk "gambler-like" trading strategies (such as heavily betting on a single instrument and ignoring risk management). The former is blatant fraud, while the latter, while potentially generating high profits in the short term, will inevitably lead to significant losses and even the risk of a margin call should the market reverse. Therefore, traders should remain highly vigilant against trading platforms, asset management teams, or individuals that display steep capital curves, avoiding being misled by false profits and falling prey to investment scams.
Overall, the fundamental characteristics of the foreign exchange market dictate the impossibility of a 100% winning rate and the inherent tendency of normal capital growth to be steady and volatile. When investing in forex, traders should abandon unrealistic fantasies of a "perfect win rate" or "short-term windfall profits" and cultivate a rational investment mindset. By studying professional trading theory, following mentors with real-world experience, and continuously optimizing strategies through practice, they can gradually improve their trading skills. Only in this way can they achieve long-term, stable profits in the complex forex market and avoid being victimized by various false advertising and scams.

In two-way forex trading, traders need to manage their greed.

---

In reality, no trader is free of greed. If they weren't greedy, why would they trade? They could simply choose to go to work or work in a factory. Greed itself is not a bad thing. It is one of the driving forces of human progress and the inherent motivation behind traders' pursuit of profit. However, many traders, when faced with failure, often blame their own greed, believing it's a good excuse. But in reality, this isn't the truth.
The true reason for trading losses is the trader's own ignorance, incompetence, and unwiseness. Losses aren't due to the excuses traders cite, such as greed, carelessness, bad luck, poor trading rules, flawed management systems, or a bad mindset. Those who continue to blame external factors, claiming they lose money due to greed, bad mindset, bad luck, poor rules, or flawed systems, are destined to be trading novices. In the long run, losing money will be their destiny. The reason is simple: if you can't even correctly understand your own abilities or are unwilling to face the reality of your own incompetence, how can you truly find a way to make money?
Traders need to clearly quantify the potential returns, strength, and sustainability of each market trend. These require clear mathematical metrics. If a trader can't do this, unable to sense current market fluctuations, then it's a problem with their trading ability. Without this ability, traders often instinctively and subjectively fantasize about making a huge profit. When they instinctively believe they must make a big profit, the market may occasionally show signs of smooth, sustained, and powerful movement, and greed may lead to gains. However, most markets are not so smooth, sustained, or powerful. Greed in these situations can turn profits into losses. If, after profits turn into losses, traders continue to fantasize about big gains and cling to them, small losses can become large ones, or even lead to a complete liquidation.
Traders should realize that losing money isn't due to greed, but rather a lack of clear criteria for market strength and sustainability. The real problem lies in their inability to judge whether a market is about to end or turn. Once they understand this, they will no longer obsess over whether they are greedy, but will instead work to improve their skills and establish clear criteria for judging when a market is ending or turning. Once traders possess this ability, greed no longer becomes a concern. If the market continues to move, they can simply hold their positions and profit. If the market weakens and needs a correction, exit promptly. If the market fluctuates within a range, traders can gradually accumulate gains through small profits.
When traders have a clear understanding and a firm grasp of the situation, they no longer worry about whether to be greedy. If the market is strong and sustainable, with no exit signals, traders should be greedy and hold their positions, aiming for large profits. If the market is weak and unsustainable, with no potential for large profits, traders should take small profits and exit, accumulating small profits through multiple trades. This strategy not only helps traders avoid unnecessary risk but also allows them to steadily accumulate wealth in the market.

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---